Sunday, November 6, 2011

Meditation Can Permanently Eliminate I-focused Narrative

At the Science and NonDuality Conference in San Rafael, CA from Oct 20 - 23, 2011, i gave a presentation entitled "No Thoughts - No Time".


The conference's theme this year was "On The Edge of Time..." and my preso was to show that if one could move beyond "selfing"/I, me, my-ing", they could simultaneously find themselves w/no sense of personal movement through time. As you will see, if you click on the link above, the opening slide was Ramana's

"Time is only an idea. The interval between two states is called time. A state cannot come into being unless the mind calls it into existence. If the mind is not made use of, there is no concept of time…The question of time does not arise at all to the one established in one’s true nature.

The first reference was the excellent Harvard paper by Andrews-Hanna, et. al paper in Neuron in 2010 entitled "Functional Anatomic Fractionation of the Brain's Default Network". The seminal graphic from this paper
shows in the lower left hand corner, the 11 main "selfing" centers that create the narrative " I, me, my" default mode network (DMN) that occurs when our brain isn't doing something specific, like "tasking", "doing", etc. The two core centers, the Posterior Cingulate Cortex (PCC) and the medial PreFrontal Cortex (mPFC) are in yellow. There are two subsidiary networks with different functions, the blue matrix does the "me - not me", and the green matrix does the "me now - me in the future", the "me in time" matrix, the focus of this conference. The thickness of the lines between centers indicates how often their activity is correlated, and presumably connected. If the core PCC for example, is deactivated, then presumably both subsidiary networks would be shut down.

The second key paper referenced was the Farb paper, from the University of Toronto in 2007 published in SAND, "Attending To The Present; Mindfulness Meditation Reveals Distinct Neural Modes of Self-Reference" which was discussed in an earlier blog.


The key graphic from this paper shows the difference between novice meditators (gray bars) and those who have had 45 minutes/day of mindfulness meditation training for two months (black bars). In this short interval, their functional operating mode moved from the traditional narrative DMN core of PCC and mPFC (in blue) we also saw in the Andrews-Hanna paper to a different functional pattern, in which right side centers, the lateral PreFrontal Cortex (lPFC), insula, and posterior parietal cortex (PPC) (in orange and red) were activated as the PCC and mPFC were deactivated during meditation, which resulted in an "experiential" mode, of "now, now, now" w/o narrative. After meditation, the meditators reverted to the narrative DMN w/active PPC and mPFC.

The interesting question was whether this change in the DMN seen in the meditators could be made permanent, i.e. could the narrative DMN be permanently shifted.

The third key paper referenced by Jud Brewer (introduced earlier in this blog), et.al from Yale entitled "Meditation experience is associated with differences in default mode network activity and
connectivity" (accepted for publication in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences) answered that question, affirmatively. The key graphic from that paper


shows that the Theravadin meditators in the study, who are principally "mindfulness" meditators w/10,000 hrs+ of practice, doing any of three different meditations, a) choiceless awareness/mindfulness (green bars), b) concentration on the breath (blue bars), or c) "metta"/loving kindness (red bars), demonstrated that they deactivated the PCC - mPFC core with all three meditations and when they were not doing any "tasking", i.e. at rest. Their DMN had been permanently changed from the narrative mode to the "experiential" mode.


The next step was to subtract the control folks' results in the study from the experienced meditators' results to see what the differences were both while resting/not tasking and when meditating. The result was a great surprise.

By looking at the meditators > controls results in the third column, you can see that the difference was that the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) was increasingly activated (two top rows) in both "baseline" and "meditation", as was our old friend from the Farb study, the lateral prefrontal cortex (lPFC) in the two bottom rows, particularly in "baseline" and somewhat in "meditation". The bottom line is that these two centers, one whose function is for "monitoring" (ACC) and one for "cognitive control" (lPFC) have been activated when the PCC-mPFC is deactivated, presumably to watch if the PCC-mPFC core begins to "reactivate" so that cognitive control can be exerted to deactivate it again.

Oh, and yes, BTW, when this happens, the sense of personal "time" is gone, to the theme of the preso and the conference.

As has been discussed in earlier blogs, "i" am heavily involved in this study, was presumably the first "non-Theravadin" to have been scanned, and am active in working w/Jud Brewer and four of the most-advanced Theravadins in the study to lay out the future direction for the work. i am also working w/Jud to secure philanthropic funding to continue this work @ Yale, and possibly other universities. There is a subsequent paper which has been generated and just submitted on real time fMRI (rt-fMRI) in which the key PCC "selfing" center is watched, second-by-second. This effort forms the basis for the Go Blue initiative both of which will be discussed in this blog subsequently.


6 comments:

  1. Excellent overview, Gary. It is a little difficult to read with the abbreviations, however. I wonder if there is a way to make posts like this more user friendly for laymen?

    Marcus

    ReplyDelete
  2. An excellent comment, Marcus.

    i have now put a wikipedia link to each one of the neuroanatomical terms to help folk w/finding their way to these areas and hopefully understanding them better.

    It does take some study, but there are not that many critical ones for our work and it does deepen one's appreciation for what is going on to know where and what they are.

    tks again.

    stillness

    gary

    ReplyDelete
  3. yep, science proves that meditation is essential for excellence. Now, how do we get people to do this when they are driven by instant gratification?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Bob. i got that question @ a presentation in San Francisco to the CIIS folk last week. As the media is awash in articles on mindfulness meditation, and the science is fairly solid on it, that helps a great deal. Ten years ago, mindfulness meditation was a fringe activity - now it is mainstream...some would say oversold and overexposed.

      IMHO, the main problem w/folk getting into nondual practices is that they don't understand it, and don't realize that it can dramatically change the number, "stickiness", and energy of their self-referential thoughts...the never-ending problematic voice in their heads that causes most of their suffering. As it becomes better understood, that appears to be changing, slowly but steadily.

      It is not likely meditation or nonduality will reach all folk as it does require certain predispositions and interest which depend on culture, religion, background, genes, family, etc., but it is possible that it may change how, and if, our species survives.

      stillness

      Delete
  4. Hi Gary, the link to your presentation is not working. I know this is an old post, but I've come late to the "party" and would greatly appreciate if you can give a working link to your presentation. Also, any links to the Yale paper, or to a blog post that contains the link. Much thanks for the sharing you do, and hoping to let the insights click alongside attempts (such as they are) to stay with the "who thinks that thought"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi SK, thanks for the catch on the dead link. That appears to be part of Google's shutting down Google+. The link now goes to a youTube video that is Part I of the two part videos. The other one is clearly marked.

      On the Yale paper, the best summary of the work, including how "i" did re the rest of the folk, is in an article "The Neuroscience of Suffering and Its End" @ http://psychologytomorrowmagazine.com/jeff-warren-neuroscience-suffering-end/.

      The published paper on the smaller study group is covered in the blogpost "Folk Who Meditate Decrease Mind Wandering" and the protocol used in the blogpost in "fMRI Scanning @ Yale on Meditation and Default Mode Network".

      Trust this is useful.

      stillness

      Delete