Q. I understand you use chanting a lot. How do you use chanting for awakening? Which chants should I use and how?
 |
Ramana Maharshi |
G. Chanting has a surprising power to move one "forward" in the process of non-dual awakening. Although Ramana Maharshi's teachings focus generally on meditative inquiry (Who Am I?), he gave some very useful guidelines for awakening using chanting. As i discuss in my (downloadable) book, Happiness Beyond Thought, Ramana actually got his name from guidance he gave for using chanting for awakening.
Ramana, whose original name was Venkataraman had been living in silence for 11 years in Virupaksha cave on Arunachala,
a mountain sacred to the Hindus, in southern India.
Ganapati Muni, a master of Sanskrit and non-dual philosophy/advaita Vedanta, had spent many years visiting sacred places, performing ascetic practices, memorizing texts, reading extensively, arguing Vedanta philosophy, and performing mantras and invocations. Devoted followers gathered around him. He had chosen the practice of mantras, as the ancient rishis had done, as his vehicle for transformation. Ganapati Muni, his biographer attests, had chanted the famous Shikvapankshakshari, and written the name of Shiva a "billion" times. Whether that "billion" is metaphorical, a translational error, or actual, he chanted it often.
 |
Virupaksha cave entrance (left) where Ramana Maharshi spent 17 years (w/o cable or internet) |
However, that great effort was not fruitful, as he still had not awakened. In November 1907, filled with despair at his lack of success, he rushed up the hillside to see the sage, now 27.
Ramana was sitting alone on a rock. Ganapati Muni fell at his feet and said:
"I have studied all that has to be studied. I have learned Vedanta shastra (teachings) completely. I have performed mantra-japa to my heart's content. But till now I have not been able to grasp what tapas really means. I have now approached you to know what it is. Please enlighten me on the nature of tapas (spiritual practice)."
Ramana looked at him for about fifteen minutes and then said:
 |
Ganapati Muni |
"If you enquire and observe where this I-thought arises from, the mind gets absorbed in it. That is tapas. While performing mantra japa, if you enquire and observe where the sound of the mantra arises from, the mind gets absorbed in it. That is tapas."
Ganapati Muni was overwhelmed by this insight, and in recognition, renamed the sage, "Bhagavan Sri Ramana Maharshi", which is how he is known today.
Chanting for nondual awakening is focused on this simple guideline. Ganapati Muni focused on the chant, but even after repeating it countless times, missed the point. Watching where the chant arises and where it disappears is where the "action" is, where the "truth" is to be found. A simple shift of focus, but a profound one. The same approach was suggested by Ramana for meditative inquiry; see where the I-thought comes from, and where it disappears into.
 |
Russill Paul |
 |
With Russill Paul at Ramana's ashram |
The chants in Happiness Beyond Thought, whether they are the short ancient Vedic chants that i learned from my chanting teacher, Russill Paul, the author of The Yoga of Sound: Tapping the Hidden Power of Chant and Music (with whom i spent a month traveling around south India), or teachings like Shankara's Nirvana Shatakam, the Bhagavad Gita, or Ramana's Upadesa Saram, all draw upon this same approach.
An example, from Happiness Beyond Thought, is a Vedic classic, "Asato Ma":
Asato Ma
Asato | ma | sat | gamaya |
Non-being | to | being | lead me |
Tamaso | ma | jyotir | gamaya |
darkness | to | light | lead me |
Mrtyur | ma | amritam | gamaya |
Ignorance | to | eternal bliss | lead me |
This chant is an asking to be led from the non-being of ignorance to the beingness of realization, from the darkness of worry, ignorance and confusion to the light of understanding, and from the "death" of not-knowing to the eternal bliss of knowledge.
Classically, this request was made to your guru, God, etc. In this work it is your personal "ego/I" asking for help to awaken, your "self" beseeching your Self for guidance. This can be a powerful surrender, a recognition that you can’t do it all by yourself.
Te | | | mah | | | mah | |
He | | tho | | | gah | | yah |
Ha | Ahsah | | | sadh | | | |
Te | | | mah | | | gah mah | |
He | | sew | | | theer | | yah |
Ha | Thah mah | | | jho | | | |
Te | | | mah | | | gah mah | |
He | | your | | | tham | | yah |
Ha | Mreth | | | ah mree | | | |
The "Te", "He", "Ha" are different focal points in the body for the three different tones used in these chants. "Ha" is the hara, the belly area below your ribs roughly corresponding to the Third Chakra. "He" is your heart, roughly the Fourth Chakra. The "Te" is your Third Eye, roughly your Sixth Chakra, on your forehead just above and between your eyes.
Chanting is more effective if your breathing is focused. Inhales are done from the “bottom up”, i.e. first using the diaphragm/belly, then the ribs, then the upper chest. Exhales are done “top down”, i.e. first using the upper chest, then the ribs, and then the diaphragm/belly. This gives a longer, smoother, more even chant; it is how opera singers get those long smooth notes.
The meditative impact is strengthened if each line is chanted on one out breath, followed by a silent inhale. An alternative approach is to chant a line on the exhale and then whisper the next line on the inhale. A powerful approach, which is a workshop favorite, is to move sequentially inward with more subtle chanting on subsequent rounds, first chanting out loud, and then whispering, and then finally chanting internally in silence. These chants are done as many times as you are moved to do.
A recording of "me" chanting Asato Ma is on the Happiness Beyond Thought website, (book > practices > chanting). On that page, you can also find the chanting tones by syllable like those shown above, as well as mp3s, for "Krato Smara Krutam Smara", and "Lokah Samastha", two other short Vedic chants useful for awakening. "Upadesa Saram", "Nirvana Shatakam", and verses from the "Bhagavad Gita" are also there, downloadable as mp3s.
 |
Stephon Alexander Dartmouth |
There are even some "techno" (yeah, techno) versions w/my good friend, Stephon Alexander, who is an Associate Professor of Physics and Astronomy @ Dartmouth (and a great jazz saxophonist), who just received the Edgar A. Bouchet award from the American Physical Society for his work on quantum cosmology.
There is also a new youTube video "Using Simple Chants for NonDual Awakening" where i chant and explain the three Vedic chants, their "tone structure", working w/the breath, and incorporating meditation.
These Vedic chants are probably 3,000 years old and are phonically tuned in Sanskrit, the root language for most Indo-European tongues, to have an impact on the mind. Some have been chanted by millions of folk over millenia.
Remember, watch where the chant comes from and where it goes to, so you don't have to do a billion chants for nothing. Watch the space around the chant as it arises. As Miles Davis reportedly said, like Ramana Maharshi, it is all about the space around the notes.
How can we contact you? I may be a little dense, but I've had trouble tracking down an email address.
ReplyDeleteHi Unknown,
DeleteIf you go to my website and click on "about", you can find my e-mail address.
stillness
gary
Hello Gary,
ReplyDeleteI have read your book and found it extremely helpfull in starting my practice of self enquiry. However I have a few questions about the fundamentals of the practice if I may.
1. Is the silence achieved/aimed for during self enquiry the same silence/'space' achieved using/during meditation?
I often find myself in a silent space (for short periods!) after initially asking the enquiry questions. Is this where I should 'rest' or should I be looking for something in that space, a sensation or feeling? I find as soon as I attempt to instigate further investigation or enquiry while in this space the investigation arises as thoughts or self dialogue thereby breaking the silence!
2. I'm not sure I have found the I-thought or feeling yet but the strongest sense of it I have so far requires me to continually mentally talk to my self. Often by simply reminding myself that 'I am myself' -ie That which is listening and speaking.
This is the closest I get to having some sensation of an I. In fact, it's more of a peculiar sensation or separation (for a brief moment) of a listener being present and separate from the speaker. However sustaining the sensation requires continuing internal dialogue for there to be a sense of someone- ie me that is actually doing the listening as opposed to the talking.
Should I be steering clear as much as possible of internal dialogue or is this kind of dialogue (which attempts to focus internally) helpful for a beginner?
3. I find attempting to focus on the watcher/awareness (not surprisingly perhaps for a beginner!) most perplexing and challenging of all. In looking for 'that which looks' I find myself back in silence. Nothing 'tangible' to grab hold of. If I look with to much effort for something tangible I often find my focus picks up bodily sensations again, usually the movement of my eyes in my eye sockets probably as I perceive these to be closest in terms of proximity to my 'sense'/idea of awareness. I then remind myself to refocus on that which perceives the sensation- again ending up up in silence but no feeling or tangible sensation of 'the watcher'. As a beginner is the silence/blank/nothingness that which I should maintain focus upon?
I realise that my questions are firmly routed in duality, and therefore perhaps difficult (or impossible )to answer accurately from a non dual perspective. I have also attempted to articulate abstract metal conditions as clearly as possible but accept the very real possibility of my failure to clearly explain my questions. Any guidance or practical insight you can give someone who is very much in the "am I doing this right" phase of practice would be most appreciated.
With kind regards,
Namaste and Sat Sri Akal
Jas
Hi Jas,
ReplyDeletere 1, that silent space you find after you ask a self-inquiry question, like "Where am I?" is exactly the space that is being sought. your experience is the common one...the ego/I comes in when it sees this space and tries to find a logical answer, or some right answer, to explain this strange space, or to fill it somehow, which breaks the silence.
The objective is to get that silent space as many times as you can. The brain likes that space, even if it is short, as it is not confused, or frustrated, or depressed. The brain is trying to reduce confusion and suffering, and now it sees an example of what can be. The more times that space is produced the more opportunity the brain has to develop a neural pattern through "trial and error" to reproduce it. It will do this if you go back enough times.
re 2, a better approach than forcing yourself to do internal self-referential "blah, blah" (which is what we are trying to reduce or eliminate) to create the "I", is to watch what happens when a sensation or emotion or a thought arises, and then ask "To whom did this arise?" or "Where is the 'I' that is in this thought?".
A good practice is in my youTube video, "Nondual awakening meditation - Where am I?" @ http://youtu.be/dmtGdoh7xHk. Use this to point you back to the "I" that is there all the time, watching everything, breathing, thinking, etc. What is this "I" that is watching? Where does it live?
re 3, that is what happens, or when you do 2 and find the stillness, silence, just rest in that. If you find yourself moving off to something else, like your eye sockets, continue w/what you are doing, i.e. ending "up in silence w/no feeling or tangible sensation of "the watcher"".
That really is the answer...there is no "watcher". The more times you can move into that stillness/blank/nothingness the more the brain will learn how to stabilize in that state. With continued work, the stillness will move from being "blank" to being sweet, full and complete, needing nothing to improve it; it will also become so stabilized that you won't have to do anything to maintain it.
you will find that there is resistance to leaving this stillness as it is so compelling. The brain has no interest in desires, fears, worries, etc. as it is content there. you will find the narrative has stopped, and your life will go on w/o worry, living in "now, now, now" as there is no place the brain would rather be.
trust this is helpful.
stillness
gary
Good to re-read this helpful post, and be reminded of the importance of remembering where to focus attention while chanting.
ReplyDeleteThanks Gary
Hi Unknown,
DeleteAs you know, there is now a blogpost "Dancing Hands for Lower Anxiety, Higher Cognition and Awakening" that applies mudras to chanting of Sanskrit from a neuroscientific perspective for several examples of increasing complexity.
It is critical, as you point out, and as this earlier blogpost describes, that focusing on where the chant arises is more important for awakening than the chant itself.
stillness
Hello Gary,
ReplyDeleteRecently I purchased one of your books; Evolving Beyond Thought. Sorry to say that it was used. I suppose that can be a good thing for the environment but perhaps not so much for your wallet. Anyway, I got the book as a result of watching a fellow give a TedTalk about how he was able to quiet his mind by practicing the Sanskrit chants found in the book mentioned here.
I did find on page 34 a note as to how to pronounce the words but I'm confused as to what the capital letters imply. For example 'pravrittiM'. Could you shed some light on this or is there a video that gives an example of how to pronounce the word(s)?
Thanks,
Chuck
Hi Chuck,
ReplyDeleteThe "M" denotes where to place the emphasis if it different from the normal placement. The rules of Sanskrit grammar are very complex.
For a video with reference to the associated text from the Ribhu Gita and how to chant it, go to Rich Doyle's email to me @ https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#sent/FMfcgxwKkRDpzxNqmStrVwxdvszxgvjs. Rich is a master teacher, which is clear from the contents of this email.
Trust this is useful.
stillness