The blogposts "Are
our lives controlled by our unconscious brain?", “How
our brain creates a useful version of reality – latest neuroscience” and
“How our brain decides for us” showed neuroscientist Dr. David Eagleman’s
research applied in the PBS series, "The Brain with
David Eagleman". This
post will focus on social issues, taken from the Episode “Why Do I Need You?”.
Humans come
equipped with social antennae.
We judge other people’s intentions. Our brains make these judgments constantly,
but do we learn this life experience or are we born with it? Babies under 12 months old have just begun
exploring their world.
Helpful bear |
Mean bear |
When the babies choose a bear to play with,
almost every one chooses the bear that’s been kind.
Our
brains come equipped with social antenna for figuring out who’s trustworthy and
who’s not.
The social importance of neural signaling
At 40, John Robison was diagnosed with Asperger's in which
some brain regions involved in social interactions are under-activated, resulting
in diminished social skills.
Dr. Olvaro Pascual-Leone Harvard University |
“I didn’t really understand that there were complex messages in faces until I was well into adulthood…I knew that people could display signs of crazed anger but… more subtle expressions like “I think you’re sweet”…or “I’d really like to do that”…I had no idea about things like that.”
But then John participated in an experiment at Harvard overseen by Dr. Olvaro Pascual-Leone to understand this
phenomena by seeing “...how activity in one area affects activity in another
area.”
Transcranial magnetic stimulation |
There was no effect until the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex, a center involved in flexible thinking and abstraction, was
activated. Something dramatic happened.
“Somehow I became different.
After the TMS I was able to read signals from other people and
understand what was going on."
Somehow the TMS had unlocked a whole new world for John:
Somehow the TMS had unlocked a whole new world for John:
“…I had no idea there were these
messages emanating from other people…now that I’m aware that they’re out there
everything I do is different…it’s a big, big thing.”
Why do we
mimic each other’s facial expressions?
Sensors for facial movements |
A second group was injected with a powerful neurotoxin making
it impossible for the brain to make your muscles contract - Botox.
Botox reduces forehead wrinkling, but facial muscles also respond
less. A Duke University experiment had both
groups look at facial expressions and then choose the word to best describe that
emotion.
Botox injection |
Dr. Eagleman - “When I’m happy or sad that feeling relies on the unconscious
feedback from muscles in my face and our social brains. So when we’re trying to understand what
someone else is feeling, we ‘try on’ their facial expression.”
The ability
to “feel another’s pain” is why stories are so powerful.
If your hand is stabbed with a syringe, it activates the
brain’s “pain matrix” which involves different areas networking together.
Feeling another's pain |
Absorbed in stories, movies, video games, etc., we run a simulation
of our being in that situation and experience their vantage points. You “know”
the stories aren’t real, but some neurons can’t tell if they are or not.
Social situations
activate the pain matrix.
Pain matrix in action |
Social pain from being excluded |
While folk played a computer game of “catch” w/two generated “others”,
their brains were scanned.
After the “others” played “nicely”, they’d cut the folk out of the game, activating the “pain matrix”. Social rejection actually “hurt”.
After the “others” played “nicely”, they’d cut the folk out of the game, activating the “pain matrix”. Social rejection actually “hurt”.
Is genocide
a neural phenomenon?
In the Bosnian war, genocide was carried out against the
local Muslims by Serbian perpetrators who weren’t strangers, but who were
frequently neighbors for decades. Traditional, universal values, like “don’t
kill” were replaced, somehow, by “go kill” and brutal atrocities occurred.
Genocides keep happening…Rwanda, Darfur, Nanking, Armenia,
Dachau, etc. Dr. Eagleman was interested in
understanding “why” through looking at genocide as a neural phenomenon.
He found that it is only possible when “dehumanization” occurs on a massive scale by/for large sections of the population, as if all members of the group have somehow experienced the same change in brain activity when they think about the now “out group”.
Propaganda manifested |
Propaganda, like a contagious disease, is the perfect tool for creating this change as it plugs right into neural networks to “dial down” whether we care about other people. The Serbians were bombarded on state-controlled media with distorted stories demonizing the Bosnian Muslims, including saying that the Muslims were feeding Serbian children to the lions at the zoo.
Propaganda always plays this tune of dehumanization…make
your enemy inhuman. It has been perfected
over time and now with the internet, any extremist group can reach millions of the
people most likely to act upon them – young men.
A single
word label can determine whether you care
For every “in group” that we belong to, there is one that we
don’t - based on anything…race, sexual preference, wealth, religion, etc. An fMRI study with 130 folk showed them six labelled hands
which were randomly stabbed by a syringe, activating the pain matrix. Would they care differently if an “out” or an
“in” group member was stabbed?
In-group strong response to stabbing Out-group no response to stabbing |
A single word label is enough to change your brain’s preconscious
response to another person’s pain…whether we care about them. It’s
not religious…atheists care more about other atheists’ hands getting stabbed
than they do about other people. It’s
only about which group you’re in.
Hi Gary,
ReplyDeleteThe example on Asperger’s and TMS is quite interesting. fMRI studies on long term meditators have shown that the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex is highly activated during single pointed concentration meditation. In may be that the diminished social skills exhibit by Asperger’s can be simply explained as an in ability to hold their attention in one place long enough.
Hi Ron,
DeleteYes, it is fascinating and could be really important that TMS worked on Asperger's and did it persistently. As you know from our time together in the Brewer/Yale fMRI work on long term meditators, the dLPFC appears to play a major role in maintaining the "shut down" state of the DMN, and supports concentrated meditation. The blogpost "Folk Who Meditate Decrease Mind Wandering" goes into this.
A concern i have in making a simple direct tie between Asperger's and TMS, is that TMS is not very precise in its effects. As the Wikipedia article on TMS states
"The path of this current is difficult to model because the brain is irregularly shaped and electricity and magnetism are not conducted uniformly throughout its tissues. The magnetic field is about the same strength as an MRI, and the pulse generally reaches no more than 5 centimeters into the brain."
Consequently it is difficult to know exactly what the TMS was stimulating when it was in the region of the dLPFC.
A second concern in linking the two, is folk i know who have Asperger's have no difficulty in concentrating. In fact, they are often hyperfocused on something the care about to the exclusion of all else, including what others may think or feel. They are often very intelligent but just don't have that part of their social networking circuitry activated.
It would also be likely that something as complex as social cueing would have a network, likely linked to many other parts of the brain like the motor cortex as shown in this post, perhaps concentrated someplace in this region, that manifested this critical skill that our species has developed to such a high level.
It is a tantalizing finding with great implications for the sufferers of Asperger's.
Thanks for the comment and continued interest.
stillness
that hand stabbing thing is crazy. Is there a link to learn more about it?
ReplyDeleteYou're a Boss, Gary!
Hi Anonymous. Great you found the post useful. Eagleman has a very active laboratory which you can investigate @ http://www.eaglemanlab.net/.
DeleteAs you can see from his website, he is very active in the field of "neurolaw", which is where demonstrating this level of bias is coming into play. His article in the Atlantic "The Brain on Trial" @ http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2011/07/the-brain-on-trial/308520/ shows how important neuroscience is becoming in the legal system.
i went through his publications, which are exhaustive, but couldn't find one that had a title that specifically described the hand stabbing. Likely it is buried in one of those papers. The actual PBS video gives more detail than the blogpost did, which you might find interesting.
stillness
gary