Dr. Andrew Newberg, from the University of Pennsylvania, appeared in earlier blogposts, “How the brain creates mystical states…how we activate them…”, “Are our mystical experiences psychotic? key indicators” and “Eat, smoke, meditate –research on why meditation works”.
With over 100 research publications and 8 books on the cognitive neuroscience behind belief, mystical experiences and religion
including the best-selling “Why God Won’t Go Away”, and Oprah's “must read” - “How God Changes Your Brain”, many folks are listening to what he's saying, whether you agree or not.
His current “How Enlightenment Changes Your Brain: The New Science of Transformation”, gives a useful, researched, secular understanding of what constitutes
an “enlightenment” experience.
Andrew had his own enlightenment experience, conducted exhaustive surveys on 2,000 others, and does state-of-the-art neuroscience research. As there is much confusion on this, an informed, professional, secular, scientific perspective is useful.
Andrew had his own enlightenment experience, conducted exhaustive surveys on 2,000 others, and does state-of-the-art neuroscience research. As there is much confusion on this, an informed, professional, secular, scientific perspective is useful.
Newberg began his own search for “enlightenment” to understand
why there were so many different beliefs.
At Haverford, he read everything, East and West, and visited many folk,
but it didn’t help. He found existing neuroscience studies flawed, incomplete,
and often contradictory. At medical
school he took an additional year studying the brain.
In an fMRI he realized, in an aha moment,
that “no one can ever know for certain what is going on in another person’s
mind and brain”, so he went “inward” for the answer, trying to “quiet down all of my rushing thoughts
and try to identify those absolute truths.”
Andrew didn’t do a meditation practice, but studied his own
mind and realized that he didn’t know “the truth about anything”. He
spent two years in an “Infinite Sea of Doubt” that was “probably the most
psychologically painful period in my life”, until “everything became Doubt”, the
only certainty he could find.
Doubt Everywhere |
He also discovered that personal transformation from
enlightenment experiences is a “biological imperative that drives us from the
moment we are born”. Andrew’s “big”
question is “Do you really want to change
your life in a radical and profound way, or are you just seeking to improve
bits and pieces of your life?”
When Andrew ran fMRI scans on his own enlightenment
experience, a sense of unity occurred with decreased activity in the parietal
lobe. This agrees with much work on the
Default Mode Network (DMN) by many researchers that identified it as a/the source of
the sense of “self and other” where decreased
activity creates an experience of "All is One".
Default Mode Network Frontal (MPFC) and Parietal (PCC) |
Andrew found that “Enlightenment is ‘real’”, and “there is
something very powerful going on inside the
brain” which has powerful, positive outcomes.
He defined two types of enlightenment experiences; “E” which
radically, permanently, transforms our beliefs and values and “e” which is a
sudden understanding “aha” moment.
Importantly, Andrew claims that his work and that of hundreds
of years of collective research from others showed that every “e” and “E” experience produces long term changes in how we
perceive reality and changes the brain centers and improves brain functioning. (This is what it “feels” like happens, and
texts like the Bhagavad Gita say, but it is difficult to prove.)
Andrew created an on-line form to solicit folks’ stories
about their most powerful spiritual or transformational (E) experiences –
nearly 2,000 responded. He asked if suffering
was removed, belief systems changed and relationships, religion, or career changed. Questions
included “How did you feel before and after the event?, What emotions did you
have?, What behaviors were changed?, Was it peaceful or disturbing?, and How
‘real’ did it feel?”.
Background, religious beliefs, spiritual feelings, ideas
about death, etc. were included, as well as how the experience manifested - w/a
hallucinogenic drug, near death experience, religious conversion, or intense
meditation or prayer. Responses were
world-wide, ages 18 to 82, with equal numbers of men and women, and from all
religions as well as 25% who were atheists.
Andrew found five common elements, with large individual
variation, in these “E”/Enlightenment experiences:
a.
Unity, connectedness, loss of individual “self/I”
b.
Incredible intensity
c.
Clarity and a new fundamental understanding
d.
Surrender and loss of control
e.
Beliefs, life, and purpose suddenly and
permanently changed
Thalamus |
Ten
% decreased their religious beliefs, while 89 % increased spiritual
activities. Men’s experiences focused on
the world, universe and consciousness, while women’s focused on God, love,
relationships and children. Although most folk were religious,
only 18% mentioned God, and < 10% of Christians mentioned Jesus.
An “E” was the same for atheists, devout Christians,
Muslims and Jews. Many atheists confirmed their view that logic, reason, humanitarianism and science were more
valid than religious belief. This is “trending”, as half of Americans describe
themselves as “nonreligious”, with a 60% drop out rate from religion for millennials.
Magic mushrooms Psilocybin |
Newberg observed “The descriptions were generally indistinguishable from the mystical experiences reported in our study…” and “if the drug experience is sufficiently powerful, it might still qualify as enlightenment, perhaps even with a big ‘E’”.
Newberg acknowledged “bad trips”, but concluded that “the
brain can be permanently changed by the effects of the drug itself or the
transformational experience or by a combination of the two.”
The
“takeaways”, IMHO, are:
1) Both large (E) and small (e)
enlightenment experiences permanently change the brain.
2) There are six critical markers, five of which vary significantly.
3) Religiously-based enlightenment approaches will continue to decline in popularity.
4) Approaches for enlightenment experiences need to recognize that differences exist between what males and
females value in enlightenment. Practices developed long ago by men in monasteries may not work for today's women.
5) Given variations in the enlightenment experience, to attract more customers, “enlightenment sellers" will broaden their focus, moving to “whatever you want/optimize for”, under the PC banner of "everyone is a valedictorian" (which nobody really believes).
"Enlightenment" will lose meaning, as have "mindfulness", "yoga", "zen", "nonduality" and "persistent". As they say, money changes everything.
6) Psychedelics will continue to be an important gateway for an "enlightenment” experience.
"Enlightenment" will lose meaning, as have "mindfulness", "yoga", "zen", "nonduality" and "persistent". As they say, money changes everything.
6) Psychedelics will continue to be an important gateway for an "enlightenment” experience.
7) This study focuses only on experiences, not on a lasting state w/o attachments, suffering, and self-referential thought, the focus of most awakening approaches, which does not generate a large "market", which is why 5) manifests.
Stephon Alexander Brown University |
My buddy, Stephon Alexander, was in blogposts "Is the universe alive? Does it evolve, think, reproduce?" and "Using simple chants meditatively for nondual awakening".
The post "Why should i do nondual meditation? There are many other meditations" referred to my presentation @ Dartmouth @ Stephon's invitation honoring E. E. Just, a pioneering African-American biologist, academic and science writer.
Stephon's new book, "The Jazz of Physics: The Secret Link Between Music and the Structure of the Universe" made the music best-seller list on Amazon. i worked closely with Stephon while he was @ Penn State and Haverford, and am in the acknowledgments. This is a book only Stephon could write as he is both brilliant cosmologist and great jazz saxophonist. If you want to see how jazz and physics are linked you might find this useful.
E E Just Dartmouth Univ of Chicago |
Stephon's new book, "The Jazz of Physics: The Secret Link Between Music and the Structure of the Universe" made the music best-seller list on Amazon. i worked closely with Stephon while he was @ Penn State and Haverford, and am in the acknowledgments. This is a book only Stephon could write as he is both brilliant cosmologist and great jazz saxophonist. If you want to see how jazz and physics are linked you might find this useful.
Hi Gary,
ReplyDeleteNewberg’s early work in the late 90’s (“The Mystical Mind” and “Why God Won’t Go Away”) showed so much promise. It’s great to see that he has taken this further.
Your blog does an elegant job of tying together the neuroscience of his “absolute unitary being (AUB)” (parietal and frontal lobes) with newer work on the PCC/DMN by Jud Brewer and others. Thanks for posting this.
Hi Ron,
DeleteAs always, thanks for another of your insightful comments. Yes, Newberg has done some nice, careful work here. There is also some fascinating work on different practices from many different sources ranging from Islam to the Pentecostals, from chanting to speaking in tongues, that give some insights into how we can make our practices more successful and effective that is likely to manifest in another post.
7) This study focuses only on experiences, not on a lasting state w/o attachments, suffering, and self-referential thought, the focus of most awakening approaches, which does not generate a large "market", which is why 5) manifests.
ReplyDeleteLove the statement, Gary. This is what's most moved me about the teachings; that the awakening state is abiding and self-referential thoughts do fall away. In my experience, the inner work to get there, especially for those of us who have faced a fair amount of pain and suffering in life, is a path that is about letting go of self-identification on every level. It's not for the faint of heart, but is clearly brings about lasting inner peace.
Hi Winter writing extravaganza. What a wonderful, clear and complete testament on these teachings. It does spring from one's suffering and the recognition that there is a path to liberation from that suffering. As you point out "It's not for the faint of heart, but it clearly brings about lasting peace."
DeleteGratitude for your sharing.
stillness
So this guy did not include permanent enlightenment shift(s) in his books and research. Instead he only talks about experiences. Seems strange to me that a guy who had a personal interest in enlightenment did not include permanent shifts. Why didn't he?
ReplyDeleteSo far it seems to me like enlightenment as a permanent shift in how you experience the world has not (yet) made it into the mainstream.
-Christian
Hi Christian.
DeleteNo, he didn't include anything on "permanent shifts", because he still, in his own practice, has a multi-step procedure that he uses to re-generate his "Infinite Sea of Doubt" experience, i.e. it's not "permanent" for him. Similarly he didn't even ask for that information in his study form - he only asked for their "experiences".
As discussed in takeaway 7), it is still, as it has been for millenniums, a very low probability occurrence. There is a lot of my, and other folks', material around that shows folk how to do it, but the problem is that they just won't do it. Andrew's prime question is the key one "Do you really want to change your life in a radical and profound way, or are you just seeking to improve bits and pieces of your life?”.
One profound experience can produce great changes in folks' lives, but it still leaves them with only a poorly-remembered experience unless they have a great desire to be rid of their suffering, and the courage and persistence to see it through and make it into where they live their life.
stillness
Hi Gary,
Deletewhy IYO, do people like Dr. Newberg stay on that "in-between state" in terms of enlightenment? simply a matter of too much life comfort to really take oneself beyond?
From what you've written, it seems to me that the Doc's practice is merely repeating some form of meditation to bring his brain to some state of deep calm abiding, and it totally lacks the quality of self inquiry, looking into your own eyes and seeing that theres no one there, and letting go of all the stories that you attach to your sense of self.
-Iftah
Hi Iftah,
DeleteDr. Newberg doesn't mention anyplace i've seen that he has done anything other than returning through his same process to the same "Great Doubt" experience, even thought he mentioned in his goals that to "quiet down my rushing thoughts" was a primary objective.
i can only guess why he hasn't gone deeply into self-inquiry and "letting go". he has so widely studied so many practices (to be covered in the next blogpost) including, Pentecostals, Sufis, traditional Muslims, Oneness blessing, Christian Science, psychography, Kundalini yoga, etc. that it is a near certainty that he has encountered them.
As far as "others" who do not pursue self-inquiry and letting go, and go on to say that "no thoughts" in not possible or the goal of meditation/awakening, there seem to be three categories:
a) folk who haven't seen, or don't understand that there are different kinds of thoughts - see video "What 'no thoughts' means - 3 different kinds of thoughts" @ https://youtu.be/WnWxCgiZfrc, and so don't focus on problematic self-referential ones which can be dramatically reduced in number and "stickiness". They don't recognize that there is no need to stop planning, problem solving, non-problematic thoughts, so they just give up.
b) Those who won't face their fears, let go of their attachments, and do the difficult work required to deconstruct the ego/I and end their suffering. Most "teachers" have tried it, and have failed, so, to keep their audience, they have no alternative but to say "Oh, it doesn't matter", which serious studies have shown just isn't true. It really does matter, a lot, to most folk, who are just now finding out it's possible.
c) Those who are just in "spiritual teaching/Enlightenment" for the money. Nondual awakening takes a lot of work and letting go, and very few will do it, so the market just isn't "commercially" large enough. The money is in what is easy, and likely to be done by a large audience.
stillness
gary
Hi Gary,
DeleteI have read the following article and would like to know what your thought on that is...
A man who lives without 90% of his brain is challenging our concept of 'consciousness'
(http://www.sciencealert.com/a-man-who-lives-without-90-of-his-brain-is-challenging-our-understanding-of-consciousness )
Rick
Hi Rick,
DeleteIt is a fascinating case and well worth reading.
The headline is misleading, however, IMHO, to get folks' attention and clicks.
Cleerman's comment that “Consciousness is the brain’s non-conceptual theory about itself, gained through experience—that is learning, interacting with itself, the world, and with other people,” is his opinion, and not anything like a consensus anywhere.
There is not even a "materialist" model for how consciousness arises from "matter". Where does the entity come from that is doing the self-learning to create consciousness? If it is there "before" consciousness emerges, and then creates it, what is it? How does it do that?
There is a model for how consciousness produces matter, however, as discussed in the blogpost "How 'consciousness' creates matter...the God particle?" @ http://happinessbeyondthought.blogspot.com/2013/02/how-consciousness-creates-matterthe-god.html.
It is a fascinating case, but just a lot of hand-waving, IMHO, to explain something for which there is as yet no explanation, unless one recognizes that consciousness is primary, and doesn't need a structure to generate it.
The discussion on the different lobes and how the functions still manifest, is a fascinating point and merits a lot of study. It really does challenge the "functional areas" model. That doesn't require fantastic theories about consciousness.
stillness
Hey Gary,
DeleteNPR named your friend Stephon's book a "Best Book of 2016." See here:
http://apps.npr.org/best-books-2016/#/book/the-jazz-of-physics-the-secret-link-between-music-and-the-structure-of-the-universe
Hi sunyata,
DeleteHadn't seen that, but not a big surprise, as the reviews were so strong and he had lots of great comments from many well-known folk in the book. he was invited to speak @ Google HQ as well.
he is a really unique, and very talented folk, on many levels.
It was such a great opportunity working with him so closely for years while he was @ Penn State and then having him invite me to Haverford and Dartmouth to speak there.
stillness