Sunday, July 24, 2016

What is an "E(e)nlightenment experience?"...a new scientific, secular model

Dr. Andrew Newberg
Univ. of Pennsylvania

With over 100 research publications and 8 books on the cognitive neuroscience behind belief, mystical experiences and religion including the best-selling “Why God Won’t Go Away”, and Oprah's “must read” - “How God Changes Your Brain”, many folks are listening to what he's saying, whether you agree or not.

His current “How Enlightenment Changes Your Brain: The New Science of Transformation”, gives a useful, researched, secular understanding of what constitutes an “enlightenment” experience.

Andrew had his own enlightenment experience, conducted exhaustive surveys on 2,000 others, and does state-of-the-art neuroscience research. As there is much confusion on this, an informed, professional, secular, scientific perspective is useful.     

Newberg began his own search for “enlightenment” to understand why there were so many different beliefs.   At Haverford, he read everything, East and West, and visited many folk, but it didn’t help.   He found existing neuroscience studies flawed, incomplete, and often contradictory.  At medical school he took an additional year studying the brain.  

In an fMRI he realized, in an aha moment, that “no one can ever know for certain what is going on in another person’s mind and brain”, so he went “inward” for the answer, trying to “quiet down all of my rushing thoughts and try to identify those absolute truths.” 

Andrew didn’t do a meditation practice, but studied his own mind and realized that he didn’t know “the truth about anything”.   He spent two years in an “Infinite Sea of Doubt” that was “probably the most psychologically painful period in my life”, until “everything became Doubt”, the only certainty he could find. 

Doubt Everywhere
Totally surrendering into this Doubt, he found everything unified and connected.  This was 25 years ago, and he “can easily trigger (it) by going into a contemplative state”.  (Hence, an experience, not a state.)

He also discovered that personal transformation from enlightenment experiences is a “biological imperative that drives us from the moment we are born”.   Andrew’s “big” question is “Do you really want to change your life in a radical and profound way, or are you just seeking to improve bits and pieces of your life?”  

When Andrew ran fMRI scans on his own enlightenment experience, a sense of unity occurred with decreased activity in the parietal lobe.  This agrees with much work on the Default Mode Network (DMN) by many researchers that identified it as a/the source of the sense of “self and other” where decreased activity creates an experience of "All is One". 

Default Mode Network
Frontal (MPFC) and Parietal (PCC)
Andrew’s scans also showed decreased frontal lobe activity, consistent with DMN studies.  He did this by manipulating his “thoughts and intentions and the use of movement, sound and breathing”, a favored approach in his research and practices.

Andrew found that “Enlightenment is ‘real’”, and “there is something very powerful going on inside the brain” which has powerful, positive outcomes.   He defined two types of enlightenment experiences; “E” which radically, permanently, transforms our beliefs and values and “e” which is a sudden understanding “aha” moment. 
   
Importantly, Andrew claims that his work and that of hundreds of years of collective research from others showed that every “e” and “E” experience produces long term changes in how we perceive reality and changes the brain centers and improves brain functioning.   (This is what it “feels” like happens, and texts like the Bhagavad Gita say, but it is difficult to prove.) 

Andrew created an on-line form to solicit folks’ stories about their most powerful spiritual or transformational (E) experiences – nearly 2,000 responded.  He asked if suffering was removed, belief systems changed and relationships, religion, or career changed.   Questions included “How did you feel before and after the event?, What emotions did you have?, What behaviors were changed?, Was it peaceful or disturbing?, and How ‘real’ did it feel?”. 
 
Background, religious beliefs, spiritual feelings, ideas about death, etc. were included, as well as how the experience manifested - w/a hallucinogenic drug, near death experience, religious conversion, or intense meditation or prayer.  Responses were world-wide, ages 18 to 82, with equal numbers of men and women, and from all religions as well as 25% who were atheists. 

Andrew found five common elements, with large individual variation, in these “E”/Enlightenment experiences:

a.      Unity, connectedness, loss of individual “self/I”
b.      Incredible intensity
c.      Clarity and a new fundamental understanding
d.      Surrender and loss of control
e.      Beliefs, life, and purpose suddenly and permanently changed


Thalamus
A sixth element was nearly unanimous - “E” experiences were extraordinarily “real”, even more real than everyday reality, (because they are) even looked at years later.   This sense arises from "significant changes" in the thalamus, where sensory information is processed and brain communication coordinated.  This lessened worries, fears and suffering.

Ten % decreased their religious beliefs, while 89 % increased spiritual activities.  Men’s experiences focused on the world, universe and consciousness, while women’s focused on God, love, relationships and children.  Although most folk were religious, only 18% mentioned God, and < 10% of Christians mentioned Jesus.     

An “E” was the same  for atheists, devout Christians, Muslims and Jews.   Many atheists confirmed their view that logic, reason, humanitarianism and science were more valid than religious belief.  This is “trending”, as half of Americans describe themselves as “nonreligious”, with a 60% drop out rate from religion for millennials.  

Magic mushrooms
Psilocybin
Psychedelics were a vehicle for many.  The blogpost “the latest psychedelic research…new meditation +/- psychedelics” @ http://happinessbeyondthought.blogspot.com/2012/11/the-latest-psychedelic-researchnew.html described research cited by Dr. Newberg, done by Roland Griffiths with psilocybin @ Johns Hopkins.

Newberg observed “The descriptions were generally indistinguishable from the mystical experiences reported in our study…” and “if the drug experience is sufficiently powerful, it might still qualify as enlightenment, perhaps even with a big ‘E’”. 

Newberg acknowledged “bad trips”, but concluded that “the brain can be permanently changed by the effects of the drug itself or the transformational experience or by a combination of the two.”

The “takeaways”, IMHO, are:


         1)   Both large (E) and small (e) enlightenment experiences permanently change the brain.

         2)   There are six critical markers, five of which vary significantly. 

         3)    Religiously-based enlightenment approaches will continue to decline in popularity.

         4)   Approaches for enlightenment experiences need to recognize that differences exist between what males and females value in enlightenment.   Practices developed long ago by men in monasteries may not work for today's women.

         5)  Given variations in the enlightenment experience, to attract more customers, “enlightenment sellers" will broaden their focus, moving to “whatever you want/optimize for”, under the PC banner of "everyone is a valedictorian" (which nobody really believes).
           "Enlightenment" will lose meaning, as have "mindfulness", "yoga", "zen", "nonduality" and "persistent".   As they say, money changes everything.
         
          6) Psychedelics will continue to be an important gateway for an "enlightenment” experience.

         7)  This study focuses only on experiences, not on a lasting state w/o attachments, suffering, and self-referential thought, the focus of most awakening approaches, which does not generate a large "market", which is why 5) manifests.  
   



Stephon Alexander
Brown University

My buddy, Stephon Alexander, was in blogposts "Is the universe alive?  Does it evolve, think, reproduce?" and "Using simple chants meditatively for nondual awakening".


E E Just
Dartmouth
Univ of Chicago
The post "Why should i do nondual meditation? There are many other meditations" referred to my presentation @ Dartmouth @ Stephon's invitation honoring E. E. Just, a pioneering African-American biologist, academic and science writer.


Stephon's new book, "The Jazz of Physics: The Secret Link Between Music and the Structure of the Universe" made the music best-seller list on Amazon.   i worked closely with Stephon while he was @ Penn State and Haverford, and am in the acknowledgments.  This is a book only Stephon could write as he is both brilliant cosmologist and great jazz saxophonist.  If you want to see how jazz and physics are linked you might find this useful.

12 comments:

  1. Hi Gary,
    Newberg’s early work in the late 90’s (“The Mystical Mind” and “Why God Won’t Go Away”) showed so much promise. It’s great to see that he has taken this further.
    Your blog does an elegant job of tying together the neuroscience of his “absolute unitary being (AUB)” (parietal and frontal lobes) with newer work on the PCC/DMN by Jud Brewer and others. Thanks for posting this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Ron,
      As always, thanks for another of your insightful comments. Yes, Newberg has done some nice, careful work here. There is also some fascinating work on different practices from many different sources ranging from Islam to the Pentecostals, from chanting to speaking in tongues, that give some insights into how we can make our practices more successful and effective that is likely to manifest in another post.

      Delete
  2. 7) This study focuses only on experiences, not on a lasting state w/o attachments, suffering, and self-referential thought, the focus of most awakening approaches, which does not generate a large "market", which is why 5) manifests.

    Love the statement, Gary. This is what's most moved me about the teachings; that the awakening state is abiding and self-referential thoughts do fall away. In my experience, the inner work to get there, especially for those of us who have faced a fair amount of pain and suffering in life, is a path that is about letting go of self-identification on every level. It's not for the faint of heart, but is clearly brings about lasting inner peace.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Winter writing extravaganza. What a wonderful, clear and complete testament on these teachings. It does spring from one's suffering and the recognition that there is a path to liberation from that suffering. As you point out "It's not for the faint of heart, but it clearly brings about lasting peace."

      Gratitude for your sharing.

      stillness

      Delete
  3. So this guy did not include permanent enlightenment shift(s) in his books and research. Instead he only talks about experiences. Seems strange to me that a guy who had a personal interest in enlightenment did not include permanent shifts. Why didn't he?

    So far it seems to me like enlightenment as a permanent shift in how you experience the world has not (yet) made it into the mainstream.

    -Christian

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Christian.

      No, he didn't include anything on "permanent shifts", because he still, in his own practice, has a multi-step procedure that he uses to re-generate his "Infinite Sea of Doubt" experience, i.e. it's not "permanent" for him. Similarly he didn't even ask for that information in his study form - he only asked for their "experiences".

      As discussed in takeaway 7), it is still, as it has been for millenniums, a very low probability occurrence. There is a lot of my, and other folks', material around that shows folk how to do it, but the problem is that they just won't do it. Andrew's prime question is the key one "Do you really want to change your life in a radical and profound way, or are you just seeking to improve bits and pieces of your life?”.

      One profound experience can produce great changes in folks' lives, but it still leaves them with only a poorly-remembered experience unless they have a great desire to be rid of their suffering, and the courage and persistence to see it through and make it into where they live their life.

      stillness

      Delete
    2. Hi Gary,
      why IYO, do people like Dr. Newberg stay on that "in-between state" in terms of enlightenment? simply a matter of too much life comfort to really take oneself beyond?

      From what you've written, it seems to me that the Doc's practice is merely repeating some form of meditation to bring his brain to some state of deep calm abiding, and it totally lacks the quality of self inquiry, looking into your own eyes and seeing that theres no one there, and letting go of all the stories that you attach to your sense of self.
      -Iftah

      Delete
    3. Hi Iftah,
      Dr. Newberg doesn't mention anyplace i've seen that he has done anything other than returning through his same process to the same "Great Doubt" experience, even thought he mentioned in his goals that to "quiet down my rushing thoughts" was a primary objective.

      i can only guess why he hasn't gone deeply into self-inquiry and "letting go". he has so widely studied so many practices (to be covered in the next blogpost) including, Pentecostals, Sufis, traditional Muslims, Oneness blessing, Christian Science, psychography, Kundalini yoga, etc. that it is a near certainty that he has encountered them.

      As far as "others" who do not pursue self-inquiry and letting go, and go on to say that "no thoughts" in not possible or the goal of meditation/awakening, there seem to be three categories:

      a) folk who haven't seen, or don't understand that there are different kinds of thoughts - see video "What 'no thoughts' means - 3 different kinds of thoughts" @ https://youtu.be/WnWxCgiZfrc, and so don't focus on problematic self-referential ones which can be dramatically reduced in number and "stickiness". They don't recognize that there is no need to stop planning, problem solving, non-problematic thoughts, so they just give up.

      b) Those who won't face their fears, let go of their attachments, and do the difficult work required to deconstruct the ego/I and end their suffering. Most "teachers" have tried it, and have failed, so, to keep their audience, they have no alternative but to say "Oh, it doesn't matter", which serious studies have shown just isn't true. It really does matter, a lot, to most folk, who are just now finding out it's possible.

      c) Those who are just in "spiritual teaching/Enlightenment" for the money. Nondual awakening takes a lot of work and letting go, and very few will do it, so the market just isn't "commercially" large enough. The money is in what is easy, and likely to be done by a large audience.

      stillness

      gary

      Delete
    4. Hi Gary,

      I have read the following article and would like to know what your thought on that is...

      A man who lives without 90% of his brain is challenging our concept of 'consciousness'
      (http://www.sciencealert.com/a-man-who-lives-without-90-of-his-brain-is-challenging-our-understanding-of-consciousness )

      Rick

      Delete
    5. Hi Rick,

      It is a fascinating case and well worth reading.

      The headline is misleading, however, IMHO, to get folks' attention and clicks.

      Cleerman's comment that “Consciousness is the brain’s non-conceptual theory about itself, gained through experience—that is learning, interacting with itself, the world, and with other people,” is his opinion, and not anything like a consensus anywhere.

      There is not even a "materialist" model for how consciousness arises from "matter". Where does the entity come from that is doing the self-learning to create consciousness? If it is there "before" consciousness emerges, and then creates it, what is it? How does it do that?

      There is a model for how consciousness produces matter, however, as discussed in the blogpost "How 'consciousness' creates matter...the God particle?" @ http://happinessbeyondthought.blogspot.com/2013/02/how-consciousness-creates-matterthe-god.html.

      It is a fascinating case, but just a lot of hand-waving, IMHO, to explain something for which there is as yet no explanation, unless one recognizes that consciousness is primary, and doesn't need a structure to generate it.

      The discussion on the different lobes and how the functions still manifest, is a fascinating point and merits a lot of study. It really does challenge the "functional areas" model. That doesn't require fantastic theories about consciousness.

      stillness

      Delete
    6. Hey Gary,

      NPR named your friend Stephon's book a "Best Book of 2016." See here:

      http://apps.npr.org/best-books-2016/#/book/the-jazz-of-physics-the-secret-link-between-music-and-the-structure-of-the-universe

      Delete
    7. Hi sunyata,

      Hadn't seen that, but not a big surprise, as the reviews were so strong and he had lots of great comments from many well-known folk in the book. he was invited to speak @ Google HQ as well.

      he is a really unique, and very talented folk, on many levels.

      It was such a great opportunity working with him so closely for years while he was @ Penn State and then having him invite me to Haverford and Dartmouth to speak there.

      stillness

      Delete