David Eagleman Baylor University |
"Conscious control is an illusion…"
“Almost every action that you take, and every decision that
you make, and every belief that you hold - these are driven by part of your
brain that you have no access to. We
call this hidden world the “unconscious”.
And it runs much more of your life than you would ever imagine.”
“All of that
conscious 'you' makes up the smallest bit of the activity in your brain. The conscious 'you' thinks it’s the captain of
the ship, but in truth it’s nothing more than a stowaway. Even our actions that we think are intentional are
unconscious, automatic.”
Baseball pitches are over 90 mph and reach the batter in 0.4 second, before the conscious “you” can register what’s going on. “I strike the ball without thinking and only become aware of what’s happened after the event”.
Drinking coffee, your brain automatically senses, calculates and controls the position of the cup, how hot it is, if it is level, where your lips are, etc., completely hidden from your conscious awareness with bundles of specialized neurons in the cerebellum.
Ian Waterman Walking w/conscious effort |
Just walking down the street is an amazingly complex operation which is done seamlessly.
Ian Waterman (9:45 – 12:22) lost this ability to do this @
19 so now he walks w/conscious effort, operating his body like a puppet master. As Ian described, “An amazing loss. An astounding facility the body has. You just don’t know what it is until it
goes.”
Dr. Eagleman vs Austin Naber in cup stacking race |
Watching Austin Naber (12:45 – 16:48), a “Champion cup stacker” perform, his EEG brain activity is almost unmeasurable compared to that of Dr. Eagleman’s. Austin has now “carved the structure of the cup stacking into his neurons” so it happens rapidly and efficiently.
As Eagleman describes, “As we learn new
skills they change the structure of our brain and it moves from software to
being the hardware”, hard-wired into the brain…automatic, unconscious and energy
efficient, like driving a car w/o any memory of how we got there, “unconsciously”.
This capability permits some extreme feats. Dean Potter (19:16 - 23:24) free climbs, solo, w/only his hands and feet…a moment’s hesitation or stray thought could spell disaster. As Potter says, “My most pinnacle moments are when I completely go away consciously and I find myself at the top of the rock, like blackout. I don’t know what happened.”
Dean Potter free climbing |
As Eagleman describes, this is “’flow”, known “to meditation
experts, to elite athletes, to professional musicians” when totally immersed in
their skill.
Dean Potter free climbing |
"We all have chatter when we are
thinking about all the things in our life…things that, really, don’t have to do
with where we’re at…The reason I’m doing all of these things isn’t to climb the
rock - it is to enter the heightened state.
So it doesn’t matter what I’m doing if I can enter that heightened state
I’m happy.”
Most of the time we aren’t aware of the decisions made on our
behalf. If you’re holding a warm cup of
coffee, you’ll describe a closer relationship with your mother than if you’re
holding an ice coffee. In a
foul-smelling environment, you make harsher moral decisions. Sitting next to some hand sanitizer makes your
opinions more conservative because it reminds you of “outside threats”. Most of the time your brain runs on
autopilot.
Consciousness can provide a unique vantage point when you encounter something unexpected, and serves as a way for our massively complex system to hold up a mirror to itself. It has made us the most successful, and dangerous, species on the planet.
Our brains get built, beginning w/our genes, which have an enormous behavioral influence. As Eagleman states, “For example, half of us carry a particular gene which increases our chances of committing a violent crime by 882%. Most prisoners carry these genes, as does almost everyone on death row. We call these genes the ‘Y Chromosome’…if you’re a carrier, you are called “male”.
However, genetics is only part of the story as some genes play
no role until they are “expressed”/activated by your environment. The family, neighborhood, culture, etc. in
which you find yourself builds your brains, steers your behaviors and defines much
of what we can become. There are no decisions that can be made independently
of your history.
Prof. Alvaro Pascual-Leone’s (Harvard Medical School)
research (45:51 – 49:18 ) demonstrates that there is nothing recorded in brain
activity that points to something ascribed to “free will”. Alvaro uses Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
(TMS) to induce a current in the cortex of the brain to initiate involuntary
movement.
By targeting certain areas, Alvaro could make participants
change their minds. As one participant
said “I seemed to have changed my mind at the last second, I’m not sure
why.”
TMS was causing the movements and
yet many were convinced that they had made choices with their own free will,
even when looking at the evidence which proved otherwise. They were certain they had done it,
demonstrating just how good the conscious mind is at fooling itself.
If we don’t have free will, what would that mean for our
lives? Well, in practice predictability
is impossible. Dropping a single ping
pong ball on 150 other balls, it is possible to very accurately predict where
it will land. But as it begins to
trigger other balls, soon it becomes impossible to make any prediction about
how the balls will end up.
As Eagleman continues, “Your thoughts, feelings, and
decisions emerge from the innumerable, ongoing interactions in your brain,
causing billions of times more interactions every second than do these 150 ping
pong balls. In your whole life, it
never stops.”
As each person’s individual brain is imbedded in a world of other people’s brains, the neurons of every one on the planet, fire, interact and influence each other creating a system of unimaginable complexity. Even with predictable rules, it will always be impossible to know exactly where any of us are going.
Eagleman concludes, “Our conscious minds play a much smaller
role in our lives than we once imagined.
Everything from what we do, to who we are, is orchestrated by the
unconscious brain…The human brain is nature’s perplexing masterpiece. It’s the most wondrous thing we’ve discovered
in the universe and it’s us.”
Great post Gary! Thanks for continuing to write this blog, and please continue. I have a question regarding how these type of findings contribute to the philosophical materialism that pervades academia. Eagleman's quotes seem to be suggesting that "consciousness" is just a small, relatively inconsequential result of brain functioning. This seems at odds with the Advaita position of an omnipresent, universal field of consciousness. If one says that the brain is acting as a "filter" for this larger consciousness, how could something immaterial possibly be interacting with the material world? For whatever reason the materialist viewpoint troubles me and I am suspicious of its validity. Any thoughts?
ReplyDeleteHi Unknown. Great the blog is useful for you. Yes, i was going to include an "explanation" along the lines of what you suggest, in the post, but it got too lengthy. It is great that you raised the point. As an academican, and concerned about things like promotion, tenure and funding, it is not wise to push the envelope too much past the "generally-accepted" conventions of your peers or of the typical PBS viewer.
DeleteIf you caught it in the video, at least i believe it was in this episode, Eagleman very briefly in about one sentence, states the "hard materialism" view of "consciousness", i.e. that it emerges from the activity of the material, the dazzling network of synapses. This is the famous "Hard Problem", i.e. there is not even an accepted postulated mechanism for how consciousness arises from material.
On the other hand, if you look @ the blogpost "How 'Consciousness' Creates Matter...the God particle", you'll see that a Nobel Prize was awarded to Higgs for proving just how matter arises from the Universal Field, which the assumption goes, must be "conscious" as we, as part of that all-pervasive field, are conscious, and we could not possess a fundamental property that was not possessed by the field. If you put "consciousness" in the search box for the blog, you'll get many more posts on the issue.
Because of his materialist assumption, Eagleman must conflate "consciousness" with the ego/I/you as the ego/I/you only arises when the neural synaptic activity produces "consciousness". There are many gaping holes in this from an advaitic perspective and from my personal experience. The blogpost "Is consciousness created because you see someone?" examines a current popular version of materialism in more detail.
There are some credible scientists who are increasingly "coming out" on consciousness being primary. The blogpost "Do your mystical experiences fit w/quantum physics? neuroscience?" gives the perspective of this new "leading edge" contingent from two of its most prominent spokespersons.
Thanks for asking the question.
stillness
Hi Gary,
DeleteThis concept that consciousness is primary and the material world is secondary...which is the same as saying 'form emerges from the formless'... seems at odds with the stance "form is emptiness and the very emptiness is form". Why does one or the other have to be primary?
What am I missing here?
And thanks very much for your blogs too. I cant view this Eagleman PBS doco online because I live in different copyright region.
I'm also currently enjoying reading thru your 'Dancing Beyond Thought' selecting a few of the verses to memorise for chanting
kind regards
Ian
Hi Ian,
DeleteThese famous Heart Sutra lines, which are chanted every day all over the world, are often misinterpreted. The translations vary a great deal, but the one you cite is the common English translation. i prefer Thich Nhat Hanh's translation:
"this Body itself is Emptiness
and Emptiness itself is this Body.
This Body is not other than Emptiness
and Emptiness is not other than this Body."
is exactly what is the direct experience as one digs deeply and deconstructs the ego/I. It is somewhat "Zen paradoxical" which is the intention of course, but it does work w/Thich Nhat Hanh's translation. The nondual/advaita practice of "I am not this body" does drive one in exactly this direction.
Whether consciousness emerges from matter, or the converse, while it may seemingly make no difference pragmatically, makes a enormous difference in physics and cosmology and in how we understand how the Universe operates, and in turn, how we understand "ourselves" and our "purpose".
we have over the course of our history constructed many different philosophies and religions based on different cosmological assumptions based on whether the earth is flat, whether it is the center of the Universe, whether the earth is 4,000+ years old or 14 billion years old, etc. Our species, apparently uniquely, has this drive/need to understand these issues and we seem to move forward in a different matter based upon these perceptions.
Great that you found this blog useful and are finding the Gita verses useful. The Gita verses, IME, are the gift that keeps on giving as one works more and more with them as we have discussed.
stillness
Hi Gary
ReplyDeleteExcellent summary. The universe literally threw up the Eagleman series a day or two after seeing your post. Looking forward to once again seeing how science rather firmly undermines much of what we take as unexamined truth.
Best
Glenn
Hi Glenn,
DeleteGreat that you found it useful, especially with the serendipitous appearance, courtesy of the Universe, of the series, "a day or two after seeing the post".
Yes, again and again, i find it amazing at how strongly our best science "undermines much of what we take as unexamined truth". It's like believing the earth is flat, or the center of the Universe, or the "I" is real...it certainly appears that it is, until a well-trained, skilled, objective observer applies some scientific investigation to the belief and it collapses.
Trust all is well w/you.
stillness
Thanks for sharing this Gary, I tried to view it on PBS, but like Ian could not due to copyright zone issues. It's really such an interesting paradox, that seems to just have to be accepted. It's as though only stillness can understand "no free will" and the narrative mind simply cannot grasp this concept. I read the gita, your blogs and e-mail, the words of Ramana, which all say persevere, persevere, persevere, which feels true. And yet the mind seems bewildered, who's persevering? With no free will, who's choosing to persevere? Is it the Self telling itself to persevere? The narrative mind seems to run in circles trying to answer this. "I don't know" followed by a quiet mind seems to be the answer that feels the best. A wonderful mystery.
ReplyDeleteHi Guillaume. Yes, the "narrative mind", which relies very heavily on the existence of the I/me/my, "free will", "choice" and "being in control" for its reason for being and mode of operation is deeply troubled, confused and afraid of that all vanishing and then "runs in circles". It raises these questions like "With no free will, who's choosing to persevere?", etc. to attempt to derail the process.
DeleteThe question to then ask is "Who's asking that question?" and "What is it that is afraid of these questions?". your "'I don't know' followed by a quiet mind" is also a great response and you can tell that by what you indicated - it "feels the best". As discussed in the blogpost "Feeling your way to nondual awakening", always feel your way to what works best for you. That is the most reliable guide i have found in this work.
And, as you mentioned, persevere, persevere, persevere.
stillness