David Eagleman U of Houston |
The blogpost "Are our lives controlled by our unconscious brain?" showed how the brain runs our lives while we are blissfully unaware. The excellent PBS series, "The Brain with David Eagleman", created by neuroscientist Dr. David Eagleman, uses the latest neuroscience to also explore how the brain constructs a useful "reality" in "What is Reality?".
Does the brain accurately create "reality"?
Shadow/square illusion |
Many visual illusions, like the “shadow/square”, show how the brain doesn’t portray reality "accurately", but instead creates a more "evolutionarily-useful" version.
Eagleman states “Our perception of reality has less to do
with what is happening ‘out there’ (in the world) and more to do with what’s
happening ‘in here’ (in the brain).
Is it "reality" when it's backwards?
Making cupcakes backwards |
In Alyssa Brewer’s research at the University of California - Irvine, volunteers wear goggles with two prisms which flip the sides of the brain processing the information though each eye. So to reach what you "see" on the right, you must reach for it on the left, in a “mind mash” in which "reality" is now backwards.
Alyssia Brewer U of California - Irvine |
significantly, even though it required many changes in the operation of several neural systems.
The volunteer can now make cupcakes and navigate a maze fairly well, while Prof. Eagleman broke out in a sweat, was dizzy, nauseated and had to take breaks.
Is "reality" different if many senses are involved?
As Eagleman notes, “Sometimes it’s easy to assume that
there is a single spot in the brain that takes care of this or that function...but in fact the vast networks
of the brain are so much more complex than that.”
Brain city |
Our reality is formed from the perceptions gathered
by our sensory receptors, which are turned into electrical signals and
transported along superhighways of neurons.
Regions w/in brain city |
Some parts of “brain city” specialize in vision, others hearing, touch, etc. In vision, there are regions specializing in colors, or edges, or motion. Our perceptions of reality arise from the interactions between these senses.
Do we see "reality" or just what we focus on?
Paul Yarbis tracked eye movements while subjects explored complex images using special glasses. A well-known study used “The Unexpected Visitor” by Ilya Repin. During the
first few seconds of seeing the image, subjects were asked “What is going on in
this painting?”
The Unexpected Visitor Ilya Repin |
However, when asked how many children there were, subjects responded “two” when there were actually three. When asked how many paintings there were, the answer was “two or three” when there were actually seven.
The brain evolved an "adaptively" useful picture of reality, not a perfect one, and as quickly as possible. Our ancestors survived by focusing on seeing lions quickly w/o counting the trees around the watering hole. Those who didn't, aren't our ancestors.
Do others see a different "reality"?
Eagleman studied 6,000 subjects with “synesthesia”, the phenomena of seeing a letter, number, word or name
with a particular color. Eaglesman chose synesthesia as it "is one of the few conditions in which it
is clear that someone else’s reality is different from mine and it makes it
obvious that how we perceive the world is not ‘one size fits all'”.
When one synesthete, Hannah, sees her name, it is colored like a
sunset.
Eagleman explains, “…inside the
brain all sensory information is made from the same stuff – electrochemical
signals. Synesthesia is the result of
‘cross talk’ between sensory areas of the brain…even minute changes in brain
wiring can lead to different realities."
"Some people perceive weekdays to have locations in space. Some taste words. Others see music…our experiences of reality can be quite different.”
"Some people perceive weekdays to have locations in space. Some taste words. Others see music…our experiences of reality can be quite different.”
The brain has never seen the "real" world
The brain lives in darkness |
It’s never seen the outside world – only electrochemical signals from sense organs that travel through neural networks to somehow approximate reality.
The brain makes it into the bark of a dog, the smell of a rose, or the smile of a friend by sifting through the streams of signals to find patterns from which it manufactures “reality” - the product of millions of years of evolution.
How does "reality" change in a crisis?
Corliss's view approaching the scene |
During a traumatic experience, "reality" seems to slow down. While filming (shown in this episode) a wingsuiting flight, Jeb Corliss misjudged his position and “impacted flat, solid granite at 120 miles per hour.”
Corliss after the crash |
After the crash, as Eagleman narrates, “Six seconds elapsed between the moment that Jeb hit the rock and the moment he pulled his rip cord. He broke his leg and both of his ankles in the fall. From Jeb’s perspective, those six seconds seemed to last a long time. What was happening in Jeb’s brain?”
To find out, Prof. Eagleman dropped folk from 150 feet in the air with a digital display with numbers changing faster than the brain can process. If "reality"/time really did slow down, then the numbers would be visible - but they weren't.
So why did Jeb recall that "the rescue took about 2 ½ hrs. But at the time, it felt like weeks.”
Amygdala taking charge |
Eagleman discovered that “in a critical situation, an area of the brain called the amygdala kicks into high gear and focuses the brain on the situation at hand…memories are laid down with far more detail than under normal circumstances...you have more information at your disposal to work out how to stay alive. “
However, when the extremely detailed record is later replayed at normal speed in "reality", the events appear to take much longer.
This richly-textured world is all just an illusion.
As Eagleman concludes “What if I told you that this world around us, this richly-textured world is all just an illusion – what we feel, what matters to us, our beliefs and our hopes, everything we are, happens in here (the brain).”
As Eagleman concludes “What if I told you that this world around us, this richly-textured world is all just an illusion – what we feel, what matters to us, our beliefs and our hopes, everything we are, happens in here (the brain).”
Gary, just today I stumbled on a 67 minute video on MeaningofLIfeTV that presents a fascinating and somewhat congruent version of whether or not what we perceive is an accurate representation of an underlying reality. The video features the cognitive scientist Donald Hoffman from UC Irvine:
ReplyDeletehttp://meaningoflife.tv/videos/32997
I highly recommend watching. I find Hoffman's theory compelling.
Hi Chris. Yes, agree on his views being congruent with much of Eagleman's work.
DeleteThe video segments "It's consciousness all the way down", "Natural selection doesn't build brains to see the truth", and "How perception is like a graphical computer interface" are well-framed conceptually, and philosophically sound, even if dramatically different from the classical views and many folks' deeply-imbedded beliefs.
The approach has the considerable advantages of some mathematical formulation and is claimed to be "testable". i agree that it is "compelling" in so many aspects of its formulation.
It is great to see such theories increasingly manifesting in academia by folk like Eagleman and Hoffman, as it indicates that it isn't professional "suicide" to espouse such views any more, as it used to be. Some excellent folk in the newer generation of academics is boldly embracing this.
i know Bob Wright well - spoke to his classes @ Princeton, was in his Princeton Corsera course, interviewed on his Bloggingheads.tv @ http://bloggingheads.tv/videos/14840, he wrote a jacket blurb for Dancing Beyond Thought, and he appears in 5 blogposts, and have been told i'm in his new book.
Gratitude for sharing Hoffman's theory. It is a compelling perspective and it fits with a lot of what we have experienced directly.
stillness
gary
stillness
This is so incredibly fascinating. Is there content inside of the electrochemical signals or are they just signals like binary pulses or something? If one were to look at signal from a group of olfactory nerves compared to optical or whatever, would the signals themselves be different?
ReplyDeleteHi Rodney,
DeleteThe signals are just binary pulses. What differentiates them is where they are coming from and where and how they are going to be processed.
Vision has been the most deeply studied of our senses, and there are countless studies of it, including some Nobel Prizes. Overview articles, like "Vision: It all Starts With Light" in BrainFacts.org can give some quick basic understanding.
It is helpful to remember that our computers work the same way, in that monitors create countless colors and perceptions with just binary information and 3 or 4 different colors to work with.
It is also useful to remember that animals and insects see different colors than we do using the same raw data, i.e. some see only in black and white, some see infrared, etc., depending on their receptors and processors.
It is indeed incredibly fascinating.
stillness
gary